DO I REALLY NEED CYBER INSURANCE?

I often talk to business leaders who tell me that their company doesnt need Cyber Liability cover, that their IT systems are up to scratch and they can't find the financial loss when we pitch the need for Data breach cover.

I could type up my spiel, I could write reems upon reems on how vulnerable all businesses are, alas I'm simply going to list some very interesting facts:

£35,000 - £65,000 is the average cost of a Cyber/Data Loss
Most policies cover claims being made for data lost offline, including documents left on trains or in taxi's
Databreaches have increased by over 150% in the last 4 years.
There are over 7,000 DDoS attacks recorded daily
The average time to recover from a DDoS attach is 12 hours at the cost of £12,000
Businesses can suffer a breach even if it is'nt a crime - 25% of breaches caused by personnel negligence.
70% of all companies tageted are small businesses
Fines for a data breach of 4% annual turnover (not profit) or £17 million, whichever is greater for a single breach to be implimented by the ICO.

Add to that this simple misnomer - How many times have you had your house burgled in your life time? Twice, maybe three times maximum? How many dodgy emails, viruses or attempted hacks have you been on the end of in the past year? I'd fathom far more than 20. Yet you are more likely to insure your house for a theft than your business for a Cyber or Data breach.

It's time to wise-up, you wouldnt drive a car or go on holiday without insurance in place, why would you run a business any differently?

Recent Nobel prize winner Bob Dylan once sang "The times they are a changing", he's never been more right, embrace change, embrace the digital.

If you want to discuss Cyber Liabilities contact your insurance broker or alternatively contact me on the details noted below.

-Tristan

Tristan is the Client Relationship Manager - James Hallam Corporate Risks - Birmingham

Comments

HOW DRIVERLESS CARS WILL CHANGE INSURANCE

Did you know that motor insurance makes up roughly one third of the total global insurance premiums taken by insurers? Did you know that driverless cars are due to bring accident rates on the worlds roads down by 99% ? (If countries and road systems were to fully implement driverless vehicles). The vehicles will be on the streets of our towns and cities sooner rather than later, the only thing stopping them is legislation, the technology is ready. Therefore basic mathematics points towards the insurance market taking a huge hit in the coming years. There isn't a glowing silver lining either, the claims that will likely occur involving driverless vehicles will be system related, 3rd party hacking or breakdown, usually low frequency events but high pay out, meaning prediction and pricing will be wayward for at least the first 3 years. While this may mean (in a fair world) super low insurance premiums for driverless car owners, what happens to those of us stu

Introductions Hello everyone, Welcome to Tristan Insures, hopefully you're here because you were directed from Linkedin or Twitter, if however you were looking for something or someone else, please stay, we have a fountain of " insider " Insurance information to discuss! My name is Tristan, I work for an Independent Insurance Broker in central Birmingham. This blog is an opportunity for me to discuss all things Business and Birmingham. I'll be bringing breaking insurance news, insider information on the best and worst of the market, sprinkled with some useless Birmingham gossip. So keep your eyes peeled and ears open, if you get any scoops, send them my way and hopefully enjoy the read! - Tristan Tristan is the Client Relationship Manager for James Hallam Brokers ltd Birmingham

TESCO BANK ATTACK: THE FIRST PUBLIC BANK HACK?

High profile hacks have happened before, we've all read about Talk Talk, Ashley Madison and Sony. We all know the words on every business leaders lips are currently Cyber, Data protection and Ranson-ware. So why is the Tesco hack any different? Why should we take notice of this attack more than any of the above incidents? Quite simply becuase this is the first time that a UK bank has reacted so publicly by stopping some types of transactions on a web banking system because of "online criminal activity". Banks are targeted all the time but typically those attacks just hit a few individuals, so do not bring about a site closure. In this case, as far as we can tell, a lot of people lost cash very quickly. You've probably read about the Natwest bank errors that lead to the public being unable to withdraw cash or pay direct debits, this is well known to insiders as an organised international hack attempt on the Natwest servers, easier to simply turn off the systems and

Tristan Insures

Search This Blog